Skip to content

Conversation

@DarianM
Copy link
Member

@DarianM DarianM commented Oct 17, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@sidvishnoi sidvishnoi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the overall content in the technical article.

I think the order of content can be adjusted so the user has to know less things upfront, by using the flow only, and maybe moving the flow diagram towards the end to give readers a summary.

Also, maybe we should not link the repo structure too much with the article structure.

3. Script fetches configuration → `api` retrieves stored JSON and returns it
4. Script renders the Tool → Instantiates Web Component from `components` with fetched configuration

This system cleanly separates responsibilities: publishers customize through the interface (the `frontend` module), and visitors consume the configuration at WebPage runtime. The `frontend` and visitor-facing flow never interact directly, they're connected only through stored configuration.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can also mention the components you see in preview are exactly same as what your users will see, as we use web components.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that's mentioned in a section below.

@DarianM DarianM marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants